Case 2300301/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr S Ratajski — 2020
- Case reference
- 2300301/2020
- Decision date
- 11 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Siddall
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a claim for unlawful deduction from wages seeking arrears of pay, including £1,500 he said was owed as a bonus and a further sum said to relate to tax allegedly withheld. The hearing was conducted by video before Employment Judge Siddall sitting alone. The tribunal found that the claimant qualified as a worker for the purposes of section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 because he was required to perform the work personally, was under the respondent's direction, and was not in business on his own account for this project.
On the bonus issue, the tribunal accepted that the parties had agreed a £1,500 payment, but found that the arrangement was conditional on the project being completed on time and in a satisfactory way. There was no written agreement, but the tribunal preferred the respondent's evidence that the project was overrunning and that the claimant's involvement was ended on 21 December 2019 because the respondent was not happy with his performance as site manager. The tribunal also relied on an email sent by the claimant after the contract ended, which it said lent some support to the respondent's case that substantial work remained outstanding at Christmas 2019.
The tribunal therefore held that the bonus was not due. It also found that the claimant had not established that any sums were owed by way of tax that had been illegally withheld. The claim for unlawful deduction from wages was accordingly not well founded and failed in full. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant sought arrears of pay, including an asserted £1,500 bonus and alleged tax/NI sums. The tribunal found he was a worker for section 13 ERA 1996 purposes, but held the bonus was only payable if the project was completed on time and in a satisfactory way; on the evidence it was not due. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.