Case 2300306/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Danso v Summit Elevators Limited HEARING HELD by CVP — 2020
- Case reference
- 2300306/2020
- Decision date
- 24 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Truscott QC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Danso
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a remote hearing on the papers before Employment Judge Truscott QC on 24 August 2020. The claimant did not join the conference. The respondent was represented by its director, Mr R Doswell. The claim was dismissed.
The respondent accepted that £961.54 was due to the claimant in respect of pay in lieu of one week's notice. It said, however, that deductions had to be made for a £500 float provided to the claimant, a £65 parking ticket incurred by the claimant, and £503.83 for 2.62 days of holiday taken over contractual entitlement. On that basis, the respondent said there was a balance of £107.30 due to it.
The tribunal recorded that the respondent had not made a counterclaim. It acceded to the respondent's request for dismissal in the circumstances. No monetary award to the claimant was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The respondent accepted that £961.54 was due in respect of pay in lieu of one week's notice, but said it was entitled to deduct a £500 float, a £65 parking ticket, and £503.83 for 2.62 days' holiday taken over contractual entitlement, leaving a balance due to the respondent of £107.30. The respondent did not bring a counterclaim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.