Case 2300308/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Abisogun-Oriku v Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust Heard in Ashford — 2022
- Case reference
- 2300308/2021
- Decision date
- 15 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Corrigan
- Panel members
- Mr S Corkerton, Mr C Rogers
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Abisogun-Oriku
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written judgment records that Ms A Abisogun-Oriku had a disability, namely dyslexia, within the meaning of s6 Equality Act 2010 at the relevant time. That is the only substantive finding set out in the extract provided.
The decision was given orally at the hearing and the written record states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. No separate liability outcome, dismissal, or remedy figure is recorded in the text supplied, so the extract supports only the disability-status finding and not a final merits or compensation decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The written record only states that, at the relevant time, the claimant had a disability (dyslexia) within the meaning of s6 Equality Act 2010. It does not record any substantive liability finding or remedy in the text provided. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.