Case 2300318/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Folami v Cheam GP centre — 2023
- Case reference
- 2300318/2022
- Decision date
- 18 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ferguson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Folami
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike-out judgment only. The Tribunal recorded that by letter dated 23/02/2023 it gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, explaining why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make any written representations and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Ferguson concluded that the claim should be struck out under Rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure.
No substantive employment claims were determined in the judgment and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment is a strike-out decision only. It records that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued, after the claimant did not make written representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's letter dated 23/02/2023. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.