Case 2300321/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Bell v Marco Nardone — 2022
- Case reference
- 2300321/2022
- Decision date
- 12 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Bell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Miss A Bell, presented a claim in the London South Employment Tribunals on 30 January 2022. The respondent, Marco Nardone, did not present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge therefore determined that a decision could properly be made under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On the claim itself, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. The judgment records that the respondent must pay the claimant £1,730.70 gross, and that £1,730.70 is payable in total. The hearing listed for 25 October 2022 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the matter under Rule 21. The judgment found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,730.70 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,731 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,731
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.