Case 2300322/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Elisha Inegbenebho v Eden Caterers Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2300322/2020
- Decision date
- 26 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T.R. Smith
- Venue
- London South via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Elisha Inegbenebho
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 26 April 2022 at London South via CVP, Employment Judge T.R. Smith recorded that Miss Elisha Inegbenebho was a disabled person within the meaning of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 at the material time, namely between 28 May 2019 and 6 December 2019.
The written record does not set out any substantive findings on liability for the underlying disability discrimination or unfair dismissal complaints, and it records no monetary award. It states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The written judgment records only that the Claimant was a disabled person within the meaning of section 6 Equality Act 2010 at the material time, between 28 May 2019 and 6 December 2019. It does not determine liability or remedy on the substantive discrimination or unfair dismissal claims. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.