Case 2300323/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Kennedy First v Gordon Moody Association, a company limited by guarantee Second Respondent: Ruth Champion — 2018
- Case reference
- 2300323/2018
- Decision date
- 24 September 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Pritchard Representation
- Venue
- Ashford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Kennedy First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 24 September 2018 at Ashford before Employment Judge Pritchard, the tribunal dealt with the claimant's claims under case number 2300323/2018. It struck out the sex discrimination and race discrimination claims because they were presented outside the statutory time limit, and the tribunal said it did not have jurisdiction to consider them.
The tribunal also dismissed the second respondent, Ruth Champion, from the proceedings. It recorded that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim under case number 2300324/2018 proceeds, so this decision did not determine the merits of that claim or any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The tribunal struck out this claim because it was presented outside the statutory time limit and the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to consider it. | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Race discrimination | The tribunal struck out this claim because it was presented outside the statutory time limit and the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to consider it. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal recorded that this claim under case number 2300324/2018 proceeds; no merits decision was made in this judgment. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.