Case 2300332/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Povey, Claimant’s partner For the v Mr A Philp, Consultant — 2021
- Case reference
- 2300332/2021
- Decision date
- 28 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harrington BETWEEN
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Povey, Claimant’s partner For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing at London South on 22 June 2021 before Employment Judge Harrington, the tribunal recorded that the claimant, Miss M Mathies, appeared through Mr K Povey and the respondent, London Residential Healthcare Limited, appeared through Mr A Philp. The judgment records that the claimant withdrew her claims.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the disability discrimination claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Breach of contract | The claim for notice pay was dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claim for holiday pay was dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim for arrears of pay was dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | The claim for a redundancy payment was dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.