Case 2300338/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs N Peck v Bakamo Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2300338/2020
- Decision date
- 16 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Siddall Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs N Peck
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment, with no response received from the respondent, Bakamo Limited. Employment Judge Siddall recorded that the tribunal decided the respondent had made unlawful deductions from Mrs N Peck’s wages for September and October 2019. The tribunal awarded £7,500 gross for that claim.
The tribunal also awarded damages for breach of contract. Those damages related to the failure to pay bonus and one month’s notice pay, with awards of £3,000 and £3,750 respectively. The judgment does not set out any further reasoning beyond the Rule 21 basis and the heads of award.
The total sum awarded to the claimant was £14,250. The listed hearing for 26 May 2020 was cancelled and there was no need to attend.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unlawful deductions from wages for September and October 2019 and awarded £7,500 gross. | Upheld | — | £7,500 |
| Breach of contract | Damages were awarded for breach of contract in relation to failure to pay bonus and one month’s notice pay, comprising £3,000 and £3,750 respectively. | Upheld | — | £6,750 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,250
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.