Case 2300341/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Smith v Phoenix Scientific Industries Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2300341/2021
- Decision date
- 9 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at London South by CVP on 9 February 2022 before Employment Judge Self, dealt only with the Claimant's complaint of unlawful deduction from wages against Phoenix Scientific Industries Limited. The judgment states that the complaint was well-founded.
The tribunal declared the complaint well-founded and ordered the Respondent to pay Mr D Smith £7,744.25, less appropriate deductions for income tax and national insurance, by way of compensation. No other claim types, findings, or remedies are recorded in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal declared the complaint well-founded and ordered payment of £7,744.25 less appropriate deductions for income tax and national insurance by way of compensation. | Upheld | — | £7,744 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,744
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £7,744
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.