Case 2300341/2022 · Employment Tribunal
K Badoi v Le Delice Bakery Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2300341/2022
- Decision date
- 22 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McLaren Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
K Badoi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 23 February 2022, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the unfair dismissal complaint should not be struck out. The reason identified was that it did not appear the claimant had the qualifying two years' service required under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 to bring an unfair dismissal complaint.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the unfair dismissal complaint. The judgment records that the claimant's remaining claims continued.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint after indicating that the claimant did not appear to have the qualifying two years' service required under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.