Case 2300358/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Scarlett Dan Miss Stephanie Endjitobadja Mr Andrei Lucian Rosca Mr Viorel Lucian Rosca Mr Thomas Robert Szabo Mr Marian Teodor Tintar v Restaurant South Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2300358/2018
- Decision date
- 12 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Scarlett Dan Miss Stephanie Endjitobadja Mr Andrei Lucian Rosca Mr Viorel Lucian Rosca Mr Thomas Robert Szabo Mr Marian Teodor Tintar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 25 August 2021, the tribunal gave the claimants an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The judgment records that the claimants failed to make representations, or failed to make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not contain any findings on the merits of the underlying employment claims, and it does not record any monetary award or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type. It records that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued after a letter dated 25 August 2021 invited representations or a hearing request. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.