Case 2300358/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Lynch (union representative) For the v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 2300358/2020
- Decision date
- 14 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Bryant QC
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr E Lynch (union representative) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing in Mr S Ali's case against London Underground Limited. The tribunal recorded that his unfair dismissal, notice pay and unauthorised deduction from wages claims were dismissed on withdrawal. The remaining disability discrimination complaints were a section 15 claim about dismissal and sections 20 and 21 claims about redeployment and remote participation, with the material period running from early September to early November 2019.
The tribunal heard from Mr Ali and considered GP, occupational health and consultant neurologist records together with his disability impact statement. It did not accept that the November 2018 occupational health questionnaire fatally undermined his credibility. It found that eye symptoms and migraines, mental health conditions, and shoulder problems were not shown to amount to a disability at the material times, either because the evidence did not establish a substantial adverse effect or because the effects were not long-term.
The tribunal accepted that Mr Ali's back and leg conditions were a physical impairment and found that they caused a substantial adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities, including dressing, standing, sitting, walking and using public transport. It found those effects had lasted more than 12 months and were likely to last at least 12 months by early September 2019, so he was disabled within section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 for the purposes of the disability discrimination claims. No remedy was awarded or determined at this hearing.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed on withdrawal at the preliminary hearing. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages claim dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Section 15 disability discrimination claim concerning dismissal. The tribunal decided the preliminary issue of disability only and found the claimant disabled by reason of a physical impairment arising from his back and leg conditions; it did not determine liability on the claim. | Other | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Sections 20 and 21 disability discrimination claim concerning the redeployment process and remote participation. The tribunal decided the preliminary issue of disability only and found the claimant disabled by reason of a physical impairment arising from his back and leg conditions; it did not determine liability on the claim. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 Equality Act 2010
- Secretary of State's Guidance on matters to be taken into account in determining questions relating to the definition of disability (2011)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.