Case 2300366/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v American Express Services Europe Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2300366/2020
- Decision date
- 5 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Britton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant's disability discrimination claim was struck out in its entirety because of non-compliance with the Unless Order and paragraph 1 of the case management orders. The judgment identifies the order as having been made by Employment Judge Britton on 16 February 2021 and sent to the parties on 5 March 2021.
The sexual orientation discrimination claim was also struck out in its entirety. The tribunal noted that the claimant had paid the deposit ordered at paragraph 3 of the case management orders, but had not complied with paragraph 5 requiring full particulars of that claim within 21 days thereafter.
The unpaid wages claim was struck out for non-compliance with paragraph 6 of the same case management orders and was described as having no reasonable prospect of success. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Struck out in its entirety for non-compliance with the Unless Order and paragraph 1 of the case management orders. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Sexual orientation discrimination | The claimant paid the deposit ordered at paragraph 3, but did not comply with paragraph 5 requiring full particulars within 21 days; the claim was struck out in its entirety. | Struck out | Sexual orientation | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Struck out for non-compliance with paragraph 6 of the case management orders and described as having no reasonable prospects of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.