Case 2300368/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Foster v City Construction (Longcroft) Limited HEARING — 2019
- Case reference
- 2300368/2019
- Decision date
- 9 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies Date
- Venue
- Ashford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Foster
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr N Foster, appeared in person and the respondent did not attend the hearing at Ashford on 5 August 2019. The tribunal gave judgment orally and later recorded it in writing on 9 August 2019.
The tribunal found that Mr Foster was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,318.00. The judgment records 7 August 2018 as the relevant date for that entitlement.
The tribunal also held that the respondent was in breach of contract for failing to give proper notice of termination of employment and awarded £1,026.00 net in damages. In addition, it upheld the claim for unlawful deduction from wages and ordered payment of £2,076.92 gross.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal held the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment. The relevant date was 7 August 2018. | Upheld | — | £4,318 |
| Breach of contract | Damages were awarded for failure to give proper notice of termination of employment. The award was stated as net. | Upheld | — | £1,026 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal awarded gross sums in respect of unlawful deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £2,077 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,421
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.