Case 2300368/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Wild v Abbey Law Costs Consultants Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2300368/2020
- Decision date
- 16 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sage
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Wild
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Sage determined the claim on the papers. The respondent, Abbey Law Costs Consultants (in Liquidation), did not appear and the judgment records that the claimant, Mrs K Wild, was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay damages of £5,943.84 for that breach of contract claim.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £5,943.84. No separate split is given beyond those two awards, and the judgment records no other claims, tests, or remedy components. The combined total of the monetary awards is £11,887.68.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £5,943.84. | Upheld | — | £5,944 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £5,943.84. | Upheld | — | £5,944 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,888
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.