Case 2300374/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Jones v Mercer Building Services Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2300374/2019
- Decision date
- 19 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams-Parish
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a short disposal only. It records that the proceedings in case number 2300374/2019 were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant, Mr P Jones, against Mercer Building Services Ltd.
No substantive findings of fact, liability determination, or remedy assessment are set out in the text supplied. The judgment is dated 19 December 2019 and is signed by Employment Judge Hyams-Parish.
On the available material, the case appears to have included claims for breach of contract and unlawful deduction from wages, but the tribunal did not decide those issues because the claim was withdrawn before any merits determination.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant. The text does not set out any substantive determination on this claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant. The text does not set out any substantive determination on this claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.