Case 2300377/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A McKenzie v Management Committee Trustees of Evelyn 190 Centre — 2022
- Case reference
- 2300377/2022
- Decision date
- 27 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A McKenzie
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 judgment. The claim was issued in the London South Employment Tribunals on 03 February 2022. The judgment states that the respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and that the Employment Judge decided a determination could properly be made under rule 21.
The tribunal recorded that the claim succeeds. The extracted text does not identify the substantive legal basis of the claim or claims, and it does not contain any findings on liability beyond the default judgment under rule 21.
No remedy was assessed in this judgment. The tribunal stated that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled would be determined at a later Remedy Hearing listed for 08 November 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment is a Rule 21 default judgment. It records that the respondent failed to present a valid response on time and that the claim succeeds, but the extracted text does not identify the underlying cause or causes of action. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.