Case 2300401/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Z Slavic v Sole Beauty Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2300401/2019
- Decision date
- 8 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sage
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Z Slavic
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Ms Z Slavic against Sole Beauty Limited. Employment Judge Sage recorded that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £1,000.
The judgment also recorded that the respondent failed to provide the claimant with a written statement of terms and conditions of employment. Pursuant to section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant two weeks' pay of £461.54. The judgment does not record any further reasoning, hearing evidence, or additional remedy beyond those sums.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,000. | Upheld | — | £1,000 |
| Other | The tribunal found the respondent failed to provide a written statement of terms and conditions of employment and made a section 38 Employment Act 2002 award of two weeks' pay of £461.54. | Upheld | — | £462 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,462
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.