Case 2300404/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D Wulff-Vanderpuije v Knight Dragon Developments Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2300404/2022
- Decision date
- 14 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khalil
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms D Wulff-Vanderpuije
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Ms D Wulff-Vanderpuije's unfair dismissal complaint. It had first written to her on 8 November 2022 inviting representations or a request for a hearing on the basis that the claim should be struck out because she did not have two years' service.
The claimant did not provide sufficient reasons why the claim should not be struck out, and did not request a hearing. The judgment therefore records that the unfair dismissal complaint was struck out. The judgment also states that the claimant's remaining claim(s) remained listed for a case management hearing on 22 June 2023, but it does not determine those claims on the merits.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint after giving the claimant an opportunity by letter dated 8 November 2022 to make representations or request a hearing on whether the claim should be struck out because she did not have two years' service. The claimant did not provide sufficient reasons or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.