Case 2300413/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Eric Adjei v The Secretary of State for Justice — 2022
- Case reference
- 2300413/2021
- Decision date
- 16 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rea Representation
- Venue
- London South ET via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Eric Adjei
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, a prison officer, brought a claim under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 for unlawful deductions from wages. The claim related to three overtime bedwatch shifts worked at establishments other than HMP Wandsworth. The respondent accepted the shifts were worked but argued that payment was not due because the claimant had not met relevant protocols and preconditions.
The tribunal found that the claimant had submitted valid requests for payment, although not through the respondent's preferred timecard method. It found that for some protocol points the respondent had either waived strict requirements or the claimant had complied sufficiently, including by obtaining verbal permission and providing required information verbally.
For the 3 June and 16 June 2020 shifts, the tribunal found the claimant was not entitled to payment because those bedwatches were outside the M25 and HMP Wandsworth had not amended its policy restricting such work at the relevant time. For the 11 July 2020 shift, the tribunal found the claimant had satisfied the applicable precondition by obtaining assurance that a defensible decision log would be completed, and any failing by the other prison in completing it did not prevent payment being properly payable. The respondent was ordered to pay £374, subject to deductions for income tax and National Insurance.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim concerned three overtime bedwatch shifts. The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to payment for the 11 July 2020 shift only, and was not entitled to payment for the 3 June 2020 and 16 June 2020 shifts. | Upheld | — | £374 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £374
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- wages properly payable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.