Case 2300417/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Fatou Sanneh First v Coelho’s Picados & Skewer House Limited (in Voluntary Liquidation) Second Respondent: Os Camacheiros Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2300417/2023
- Decision date
- 17 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lumby REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Fatou Sanneh First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal dismissed all claims against the second respondent and found that the claimant was an employee of the first respondent at the relevant time.
The Tribunal found the holiday pay complaint well-founded because the first respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay for holidays accrued but not taken when the claimant's employment ended. It awarded £180.50 for that complaint.
The Tribunal also found that, when proceedings began, the first respondent was in breach of its duty to provide a written statement of employment particulars. Under section 38 Employment Act 2002, it awarded an amount equal to two weeks' gross pay, £241.42.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The holiday pay complaint was well-founded against the first respondent. All claims against the second respondent were dismissed. | Upheld | — | £181 |
| Other | Failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars. All claims against the second respondent were dismissed. | Upheld | — | £241 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £422
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.