Case 2300420/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Ashby v Screwfix Direct Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2300420/2019
- Decision date
- 23 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khalil Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Ashby
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment in case 2300420/2019 records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by Miss D Ashby. No findings were made on the merits and no remedy was awarded.
The case context identifies the listed issues as unfair dismissal, victimisation, and sexual orientation discrimination, but the judgment text itself does not set out any substantive determination on those claims. The only procedural outcome recorded is dismissal after withdrawal.
The judgment is dated 23 October 2019 and is signed by Employment Judge Khalil Date. There is no panel of lay members listed in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sexual orientation discrimination | The judgment itself only states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim. The discrimination category is taken from the case context/listing rather than the judgment text. | Withdrawn | Sexual orientation | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment itself only states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim. The unfair dismissal category is taken from the case context/listing rather than the judgment text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Victimisation | The judgment itself only states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim. The victimisation category is taken from the case context/listing rather than the judgment text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.