Case 2300423/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Bryony Bond v Morgan Hodges Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2300423/2020
- Decision date
- 1 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hargrove
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Bryony Bond
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which the respondent had filed a response admitting that the claimant was entitled to £660.92 as unpaid wages. The respondent's director also admitted at a case management hearing on 1 April 2020 that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment because the respondent had ceased trading on 18 September 2019.
The tribunal therefore found the claims for unpaid wages and redundancy payment well founded and ordered the respondent to pay £660.92 as unpaid wages under section 24 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and £912 as a redundancy payment under section 164 of the Act. The judgment does not record any separate award of interest or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent admitted the claimant was entitled to £660.92 as unpaid wages, and the tribunal ordered payment under section 24 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £661 |
| Redundancy | At a case management hearing on 1 April 2020, the respondent's director admitted the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment after the respondent ceased trading on 18 September 2019. | Upheld | — | £912 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,573
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.