Case 2300425/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Charlery v Caversham Finance Limited t/a Brighthouse — 2019
- Case reference
- 2300425/2019
- Decision date
- 8 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tsamados
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Charlery
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss C Charlery brought a complaint of unfair dismissal against Caversham Finance Ltd t/a Brighthouse. The tribunal, sitting alone before Employment Judge Tsamados at London South on 8 November 2019, held that it had no jurisdiction to hear the complaint because it had been presented outside the time limit in section 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
As a result, the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed. The judgment records no liability finding on the merits of the dismissal and no monetary award. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written record states that no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal complaint because it was presented outside the time limit in section 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 111 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.