Case 2300436/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 2300436/2020
- Decision date
- 15 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Balogun Dated
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe matter was heard by Employment Judge Balogun at London South on 11-15 October 2021, with the claimant appearing in person, the respondent represented by counsel, and an Urdu interpreter present. The tribunal struck out the disability discrimination claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Procedural Rules 2013 because the claimant failed to comply with the tribunal's orders.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was owed 3 hours 3 minutes' wages for 11 July 2019, and that the amount due was £35.53 gross. That sum was the only monetary award recorded in the judgment.
The tribunal said that all other claims failed and were dismissed. The extracted text does not set out separate findings or reasoning for each of those dismissed claims.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Included in the tribunal's statement that all other claims fail and are dismissed; the extracted text does not give separate reasoning for this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Included in the tribunal's statement that all other claims fail and are dismissed; the extracted text does not give separate reasoning for this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal struck out the disability discrimination claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Procedural Rules 2013 because the claimant failed to comply with the tribunal's orders. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant was owed 3 hours 3 minutes' wages for 11 July 2019, amounting to £35.53 gross. | Upheld | — | £36 |
| Working time regulations | Included in the tribunal's statement that all other claims fail and are dismissed; the extracted text does not give separate reasoning for this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £36
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Procedural Rules 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.