Case 2300439/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Husain v Marsh Wall Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2300439/2020
- Decision date
- 13 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ferguson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Husain
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not enter a response to the claim. The tribunal therefore entered judgment for the claimant under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £7,326.38. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £3,865.00.
The listed hearing on 2 September 2020 was cancelled. The judgment records no further reasons or separate remedy calculations beyond the two sums awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; respondent failed to enter a response. Tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum of £7,326.38 for unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £7,326 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment; respondent failed to enter a response. Tribunal ordered payment of £3,865.00 for unpaid holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £3,865 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,191
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.