Case 2300439/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Lloyd Marshall v Leon Kennedy Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2300439/2022
- Decision date
- 27 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G. King Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Lloyd Marshall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the Claimant’s ET1 was submitted within the statutory time limit and that the Employment Tribunal had jurisdiction to hear the case. The hearing was before Employment Judge G. King sitting alone, with the Claimant in person and the Respondent represented by Danielle Fox, solicitor.
The only substantive determination recorded in the judgment was that the Claimant’s claim for constructive unfair dismissal was struck out. The reason given was that the Claimant did not have the required two years’ service to bring such a claim.
No remedy was awarded and no further factual findings, legal tests, or liability findings are set out in the written record. The judgment notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal struck out the constructive unfair dismissal claim because the Claimant did not have the required two years' service to bring such a claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.