Case 2300453/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Camburn v Vet Partners Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2300453/2020
- Decision date
- 11 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Camburn
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment. The respondent, Vet Partners Ltd, did not present a response within the stipulated time. Employment Judge Martin issued the judgment on 11 August 2020 on the papers.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from Ms Camburn’s wages and ordered payment of £1,225.95. It also found that Ms Camburn was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £1,550.00.
No discrimination, unfair dismissal, or other statutory claims are recorded in the judgment text. The judgment does not set out any separate remedy components beyond the two sums awarded on the two claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent did not present a response within the stipulated time. | Upheld | — | £1,226 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the dismissal was in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £1,550 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,776
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.