Case 2300455/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Chacon v Aspire Cleaning Contractors Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2300455/2020
- Decision date
- 8 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ferguson Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Chacon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Ferguson heard the case for Mr N Chacon against Aspire Cleaning Contractors Limited at London South on 27 and 28 January 2022. The tribunal upheld the claim for wrongful dismissal and awarded damages of £1,774.84. It also found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,614.16 net, and found that holiday entitlement had not been paid, awarding £1,346.25.
The tribunal also found that Mr Chacon had been unfairly dismissed. It awarded a basic award of £1,553.37 and a compensatory award of £7,643.86, giving a total award of £13,932.48. The judgment records a prescribed period for recoupment of 9 December 2019 to 28 January 2022, with a prescribed element of £7,243.86 and a balance of £6,688.62.
The record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note to the judgment. The judgment does not set out the tribunal's full reasoning in the written record, so the extracted findings are limited to the outcomes and remedy figures recorded in the decision.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,775 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,614 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,346 |
| Unfair dismissal | The award was made up of a basic award of £1,553.37 and a compensatory award of £7,643.86. | Upheld | — | £9,197 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,932
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,553
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £7,644
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.