Case 2300456/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Courtney Deal v Apcoa Parking Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2300456/2019
- Decision date
- 1 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nash Representation
- Venue
- Croydon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Courtney Deal
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed. Written reasons were not included in the judgment because reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The tribunal also found that the respondent did not make unauthorized deductions from the claimant's wages contrary to section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996. The respondent was ordered to pay compensation for unfair dismissal only, made up of a basic award and a compensatory award. The recoupment provisions did not apply.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £4,326 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent did not make unauthorized deductions from wages contrary to section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,326
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,632
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £2,694
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.