Case 2300456/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Z Holland v Kims Hospital — 2021
- Case reference
- 2300456/2020
- Decision date
- 11 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Z Holland
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mrs Z Holland's claim against Kims Hospital. By letter dated 13 November 2020, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out on three grounds: that the proceedings had been conducted in a scandalous, unreasonable or vexatious manner; that the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 7 February 2020; and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. It also recorded that the hearing listed for 7 April 2021 to 8 April 2021 would not take place. The judgment makes no substantive findings on liability and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type(s); it records only that the claim was struck out under rule 37. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 37
- scandalous, unreasonable or vexatious
- not actively pursued
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.