Case 2300457/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Griffiths v Network Rail Infrastructure Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2300457/2019
- Decision date
- 9 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge HYDE
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Griffiths
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal had written to the claimant on 22 May 2020 giving him an opportunity to make representations about why the claim should not be struck out on the basis that it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim, and the hearing listed for 2 to 5 November 2020 was vacated.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment strikes out the claim as a whole for not being actively pursued; the gov.uk listing categorises the case as including unfair dismissal. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment strikes out the claim as a whole for not being actively pursued; the gov.uk listing categorises the case as including disability discrimination. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment strikes out the claim as a whole for not being actively pursued; the gov.uk listing categorises the case as including breach of contract. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.