Case 2300477/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S C Oblau v Artificial Solutions UK Ltd (in Liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2300477/2021
- Decision date
- 27 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ferguson
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S C Oblau
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Respondent failed to enter a response to the claim. Employment Judge Ferguson, sitting alone, gave judgment at London South Employment Tribunal on 27 March 2023.
The Tribunal dismissed the claims for notice pay and unauthorised deductions from wages upon withdrawal. It found that the Claimant was unfairly dismissed and awarded a compensatory award of £3,322.48.
The Tribunal also found that the Respondent had failed to pay the Claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £942.30 gross. The total award recorded in the judgment was £4,264.78.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment describes this as a claim for notice pay and states it was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states the claim for unauthorised deductions from wages was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the Claimant was unfairly dismissed and awards a compensatory award of £3,322.48. | Upheld | — | £3,322 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the Respondent failed to pay the Claimant's holiday entitlement and orders payment of £942.30 gross. | Upheld | — | £942 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,265
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £3,322
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.