Case 2300483/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Glyde v Artificial Solutions UK Ltd (in Liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 2300483/2021
- Decision date
- 27 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Evans Approved
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Glyde
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to enter a Response to the claim. Judgment was therefore given for the claimant under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages, had dismissed the claimant in breach of contract in respect of notice, and had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of the gross amounts specified, taking into account gross amounts paid by the Insolvency Service.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and must pay this gross amount. | Upheld | — | £2,042 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awards damages for that breach. | Upheld | — | £6,766 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £3,813 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,621
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 - Rule 22
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.