Case 2300486/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Wilson-Fry v Artificial Solutions UK Ltd (in Liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2300486/2021
- Decision date
- 27 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ferguson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Wilson-Fry
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the claimant did not attend the final hearing on 27 March 2023 and gave no explanation. Case management orders were sent on 19 May 2023, giving the claimant an opportunity to provide further information so that the claim could be determined under Rule 21.
The claimant did not provide the further information and did not contact the Tribunal. The Tribunal noted that the claimant had been warned that failure to provide the information could lead to the claims being considered for strike out on the basis that they were not being actively pursued.
Employment Judge Ferguson was satisfied that the claim had not been actively pursued and struck out all complaints except the claim for a protective award under Rule 37. No monetary remedy was awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that all complaints other than the claim for a protective award were struck out; this claim type is identified from the gov.uk listing categories. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that all complaints other than the claim for a protective award were struck out; this claim type is identified from the gov.uk listing categories. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that all complaints other than the claim for a protective award were struck out; this claim type is identified from the gov.uk listing categories. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment states that all complaints other than the claim for a protective award were struck out; this claim type is identified from the gov.uk listing categories. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that all complaints other than the claim for a protective award were struck out; this claim type is identified from the gov.uk listing categories. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21
- Rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.