Case 2300496/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Tanai v Old Town Apartments Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2300496/2021
- Decision date
- 21 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Atkins JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal listed the case for a hearing on 21 April 2022 at London South (Croydon) by CVP. The respondent did not file an ET3, and after the claim was first notified to the tribunal the respondent’s registered office changed, so proceedings were re-served at the new address. The tribunal also recorded that the claim had not been quantified, and on 13 January 2022 the claimant was asked to provide details of wages and loss, but she did not respond.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not separately determine this head of claim; the claim was dismissed as a whole under Rule 47 after neither party attended. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment does not separately determine this head of claim; the claim was dismissed as a whole under Rule 47 after neither party attended. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not separately determine this head of claim; the claim was dismissed as a whole under Rule 47 after neither party attended. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not separately determine this head of claim; the claim was dismissed as a whole under Rule 47 after neither party attended. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment does not separately determine this head of claim; the claim was dismissed as a whole under Rule 47 after neither party attended. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.