Case 2300497/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Ms T O’Halloran — 2023
- Case reference
- 2300497/2020
- Decision date
- 16 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Webster
- Venue
- London South
- Panel members
- Ms L Grayson, Mr K Murphy
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with claims brought by Mr Melcioiu against Clarion Housing Group Ltd. It partially upheld the claim for unauthorised deduction from wages, limited to the first aid allowance, fire warden allowance and travel allowance, and awarded £1,252.66 gross. The written decision records that reasons were given orally at the hearing; no written reasons were provided in the judgment text.
The remaining wages claim for holiday pay was not upheld. The tribunal also dismissed the unfair dismissal claim.
The disability discrimination claims were also rejected. The tribunal did not uphold the claim of direct disability discrimination, and it did not uphold the claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of the first aid allowance, fire warden allowance and travel allowance was partially upheld. Award stated as £1,252.66 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,253 |
| Holiday pay | Claim for unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of holiday pay was not upheld. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Claimant's claim for unfair dismissal was not upheld. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination claim was not upheld. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments was not upheld. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,253
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.