Case 2300498/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Abimbola v Delta Nursing Agency Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2300498/2019
- Decision date
- 7 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Representation
- Venue
- Croydon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Abimbola
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr B Abimbola presented a claim on 12 February 2019 alleging unlawful deductions from wages under s.13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, claiming a total of £2,488.06. The respondent's ET3 had initially been rejected as out of time, but the Tribunal reconsidered that decision and allowed the response because the deadline of 19 April 2019 fell on Good Friday and, applying Rule 4(2), the ET3 received on 23 April 2019 was in time as the next working day.
At the hearing the respondent did not attend. The Tribunal heard Mr Caiden's submissions, reviewed the payslips and bank statement, and considered internal correspondence said to show the respondent accepted the sums were due. It accepted the claimant's version of events, including that the respondent's email suggesting a COT3 settlement had not in fact reflected any agreed settlement and was corroborated by Acas.
On the merits, the Tribunal found that six payslips showed payments due to the claimant that were not received into his bank account. It held that £2,488.06 had been unlawfully deducted from wages contrary to s.13 ERA 1996 and ordered the respondent to pay that net sum. The Tribunal also made an unless order about the claimant's costs application, requiring any response from the respondent within seven days of receipt of the application.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Tribunal allowed the respondent's reconsideration application on the ET3 timing issue, but found the response had in fact been presented in time because the due date fell on Good Friday and the next working day was 23 April 2019. The substantive claim for six unpaid wage payments succeeded under s.13 ERA 1996. | Upheld | — | £2,488 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,488
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Rule 4(2) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.