Case 2300503/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Ms Glynis Duffy, Consultant — 2019
- Case reference
- 2300503/2019
- Decision date
- 28 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Blackwell Case
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge J Blackwell, sitting alone at London South on 28 November 2019, recorded a brief judgment by consent in favour of the claimant, Miss M I Benfatta, against Amity College Limited. The judgment orders the respondent to pay £844.44 by consent, but it does not identify the underlying head or heads of claim or set out any merits findings for that sum.
The tribunal also ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £480.00 pursuant to section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, described in the judgment as the minimum amount. The total amount ordered to be paid was therefore £1,324.44. No further reasons, findings of fact, or panel members are recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | By consent, the respondent was ordered to pay £844.44. The judgment does not specify the underlying head or heads of claim covered by that sum. | Settled | — | — |
| Other | Pursuant to section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, the tribunal ordered payment of the minimum amount of £480.00. | Upheld | — | £480 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,324
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 38 of the Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.