Case 2300504/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Ms Glynis Duffy, Consultant — 2019
- Case reference
- 2300504/2019
- Decision date
- 28 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Blackwell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the respondent accepted liability for arrears of wages and, by consent, was ordered to pay Ms Joanna Bednarz £863.17 in respect of that sum. The judgment does not record a contested finding on the wages element beyond the agreed amount.
Holiday pay was disputed. The tribunal found that Ms Bednarz had worked exactly six months of the year, so she was entitled to half of the annual statutory allowance of 28 days, namely 14 days. The tribunal accepted her evidence that she had taken six days' leave and that one bank holiday also fell within the period, so seven days had to be deducted from the 14-day entitlement.
On that basis, the tribunal held that she was entitled to seven days' holiday pay. Using the agreed daily rate of £64, the tribunal awarded £448 for unpaid holiday pay. The judgment records no other remedy, and the total payable under the judgment is £1,311.17.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Ordered by consent; the respondent already accepted that £863.17 was owed in arrears of wages. | Settled | — | £863 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence that she worked six months of the year, had taken six days' leave plus one bank holiday, and was therefore entitled to seven days' holiday pay at £64 per day. | Upheld | — | £448 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,311
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.