Case 2300512/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Darren Higgins v Miller Druck International Stone Limited (In Liquidation) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2300512/2020
- Decision date
- 14 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fowell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Darren Higgins
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Fowell recorded that the respondent had failed to submit a response to the claim, and judgment was therefore entered for the claimant on 14 May 2020. The one-page judgment does not break down the liability decision by individual head of claim; it states only that judgment is entered for the claimant.
The tribunal did not determine remedy in this document. It directed that the parties would be notified of a date for a remedy hearing, so no monetary award was fixed at this stage.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Mapped from the publicly listed protective award head. The extracted judgment text does not identify the individual heads of claim; it records only that judgment was entered for the claimant because the respondent failed to submit a response. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | The extracted judgment enters judgment for the claimant but does not quantify any redundancy-related award. A remedy hearing was listed. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The extracted judgment enters judgment for the claimant but does not set out separate liability findings or any compensation figure. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The extracted judgment enters judgment for the claimant but does not quantify any wage deduction award. Remedy was left to a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.