Case 2300513/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms. G Crew of Counsel For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 2300513/2018
- Decision date
- 11 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sage Members
- Venue
- London South Croydon
- Panel members
- Ms. E. Whitlam, Dr R P Fernando
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Ms. G Crew of Counsel For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing in London South Croydon on 10-11 April 2019, Employment Judge Sage with members Ms. E. Whitlam and Dr R P Fernando considered a disability issue arising in the case. The tribunal found that the claimant's impairments of chronic fatigue/chronic stroke syndrome, stress, panic attacks and anxiety were not disabilities under the Equality Act.
The respondent's applications for a strike out and/or deposit order were unsuccessful. The judgment does not record any final merits determination of the underlying claims at this stage, and instead states that the hearing was listed for 29 June 2020.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary hearing only. The tribunal found that the claimant's impairments of chronic fatigue/chronic stroke syndrome, stress, panic attacks and anxiety were not disabilities under the Equality Act. | Other | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.