Case 2300527/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 2300527/2020
- Decision date
- 30 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyde Dated
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London South on 26 and 27 November 2020 before Employment Judge C Hyde sitting alone. Mr A Warsame appeared in person and Engie Services Limited was represented by counsel.
The tribunal held that Mr Warsame's unfair dismissal complaint was not well founded and dismissed it. The written record does not set out detailed reasons, but it records the dismissal as the tribunal's judgment on that complaint.
The tribunal also dealt with a redundancy payment claim, describing it as having been brought in error. That claim was struck out. The written record notes that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the unfair dismissal complaint of Mr A Warsame was not well founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The tribunal struck out the redundancy payment claim because it was brought in error. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.