Case 2300532/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Arlette Nash v The Secretary of State for Justice — 2023
- Case reference
- 2300532/2021
- Decision date
- 2 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Abbott
- Venue
- London South
- Panel members
- Ms J Forecast, Mr N Shanks
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Arlette Nash
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal unanimously dismissed Ms Nash's claim against the Secretary of State for Justice. The judgment records that the claim was brought under section 44(1)(d), alternatively section 44(1)(e), of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and that it was not well-founded.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing. The written judgment does not set out the factual findings or reasoning beyond the conclusion that the section 44 claim was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment identifies the claim as under section 44(1)(d), alternatively section 44(1)(e), of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The locked taxonomy has no specific health and safety detriment category, so it is classified as other. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 44(1)(d) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 44(1)(e) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.