Case 2300535/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Nicholas Lewis v Stonegate Pub Company Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2300535/2020
- Decision date
- 2 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Keogh Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Nicholas Lewis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr Nicholas Lewis, brought claims against Stonegate Pub Company for unlawful deductions from wages and breach of contract. The case was heard at London South Employment Tribunal on 2 February 2021 before Employment Judge Keogh, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by an employee relations manager.
The tribunal recorded judgment that the claims for unlawful deductions from wages and breach of contract were unsuccessful and dismissed. The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing, and no written reasons are included in the written record supplied.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim for unlawful deductions from wages was unsuccessful and dismissed. Written reasons were not provided in the supplied judgment text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the breach of contract claim was unsuccessful and dismissed. Written reasons were not provided in the supplied judgment text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.