Case 2300539/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Willis v Corrine Sterry T/A Baloolah Hair — 2022
- Case reference
- 2300539/2022
- Decision date
- 1 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Balogun Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Willis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered Miss E Willis’s unfair dismissal complaint against Corrine Sterry T/A Baloolah Hair. It recorded that section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires two years’ service before an unfair dismissal complaint can be brought, and found that the claimant had been employed for less than two years.
The claimant was given until 8 June 2022 to provide reasons why the claim should not be struck out, but did not respond. The tribunal therefore struck out the unfair dismissal complaint.
The judgment states that the claimant’s other complaints were not affected by this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant had been employed for less than two years, so section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996 prevented an unfair dismissal complaint. The claimant was given until 8 June 2022 to explain why the claim should not be struck out, but did not respond. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.