Case 2300540/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Sarah Perryman v RSL Awards Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2300540/2020
- Decision date
- 13 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Housego Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Sarah Perryman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary judgment on time limits only, not a determination of the merits. The claimant, Sarah Perryman, resigned on 31 July 2019 with notice expiring on 22 September 2019. The early conciliation notification was made on 29 November 2019, the certificate was dated 29 December 2019, and the claim was lodged on 30 January 2020, one day outside the limitation date of 29 January 2020.
For the unfair dismissal claim, Employment Judge Housego accepted the claimant's evidence about the circumstances affecting her at the time, including maternity leave, the birth of her baby on 21 March 2019, her move back to Cardiff, a new job, her father's death in 2019, and anxiety and depression for which she was taking Sertraline and receiving counselling. The judge found that she knew there was a time limit but mistakenly believed the deadline was the end of January, and that this error was understandable in her circumstances. The tribunal held that it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim in time and that the short delay after expiry was reasonable.
For the discrimination claim, the tribunal applied the just and equitable time limit and reached the same practical conclusion. The judge noted that the same considerations applied, and also took account of the limited prejudice to the respondent from a delay of less than 24 hours, compared with the claimant losing the claim entirely if it were struck out. The result was that both claims were allowed to proceed and neither was struck out. No substantive liability decision or monetary award was made in this judgment, and directions were redated for the later case management timetable.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Preliminary limitation ruling only. The tribunal held that it was not reasonably practicable for the unfair dismissal claim to be presented within the time limit and that the claim was presented within a further reasonable period, so it was not struck out. | Other | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Preliminary limitation ruling only. The tribunal held that it was just and equitable to permit the discrimination claim to proceed, and it was not struck out. The judgment describes this as a discrimination claim relating to pregnancy and maternity. | Other | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.111(2)(b) ERA 1996
- s.123 Equality Act 2010
- not reasonably practicable test
- just and equitable test
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.