Case 2300567/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Mane v The Elephant Pubs & Restaurant Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2300567/2023
- Decision date
- 6 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspinall Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Mane
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss J Mane brought a wages claim against The Elephant Pubs & Restaurant Ltd. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages of £505.40 for November 2022 and £163.88 for December 2022. It also recorded that the respondent made payments of £163.88 on 13 February 2023 and £50.50 on 13 March 2023.
After taking those payments into account, the tribunal said the respondent must pay £454.90 gross. It then deducted £8.36 owed by the claimant to the respondent in respect of holiday pay, leaving £446.54 payable in total.
The judgment also states that the claimant must account to HMRC for any sums owed by her in respect of any payment received under the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages of £505.40 for November 2022 and £163.88 for December 2022. It recorded later payments of £163.88 on 13 February 2023 and £50.50 on 13 March 2023, then deducted £8.36 owed by the claimant in holiday pay, leaving £446.54 payable. | Upheld | — | £447 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £447
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.