Case 2300570/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Did not appear For the v Excel Childcare Services Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2300570/2019
- Decision date
- 19 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams-Parish Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Did not appear For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 19 August 2019, at London South Employment Tribunal before Employment Judge Hyams-Parish, the tribunal recorded receipt of a written email from Miss E Lockwood confirming that she wished to withdraw her claims. The judgment states that, on that basis, all claims were dismissed.
The extracted judgment does not contain findings on the merits of the underlying claims, and it does not record any remedy, award, or liability apportionment. It is therefore a procedural disposal following withdrawal rather than a substantive determination of the listed claims.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment records that the claimant wrote to say she wished to withdraw her claims, and all claims were dismissed. The extracted text does not set out a separate merits finding for this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claimant wrote to say she wished to withdraw her claims, and all claims were dismissed. The extracted text does not set out a separate merits finding for this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the claimant wrote to say she wished to withdraw her claims, and all claims were dismissed. The extracted text does not set out a separate merits finding for this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment records that the claimant wrote to say she wished to withdraw her claims, and all claims were dismissed. The extracted text does not set out a separate merits finding for this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.